Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:24

Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Dear Doctor: What are the best ways to help my kidneys recover from nearly failing? - OregonLive.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
ASCO day 2: A tragic paradox, Gilead updates, and lots of Pfizer news - statnews.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Webb telescope took a direct image of two exoplanets. See it now. - Mashable
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is there a band whose members have been present for every one of their concerts?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
A Cosmic Tech Mystery Results in Literal Lost Souls in This Sci-Fi Short Story - Gizmodo
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.